Proponents of Internet censorship cite potential harm, and opponents cite the First Amendment, but White (philosophy, Ohio U.-Zanesville) says neither side justifies its argument adequately. After refuting them, she offers a third alternative. Her consequentialist argument for an unregulated Internet holds that the dis-utility of the Internet that censorship would cause is worse than the unproven harm of sexual explicit material on it. Annotation ©2007 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)